Separation is a dirty word in almost every Christian circle today.
Christians have mistaken a few important passages of the Bible to mean that
believers of all sorts and stripes should ignore our differences get along in
unity. They would accuse separation as the culprit leading the world to despise
the faith. They would urge us to tear down the doctrinal walls and get along
for the sake of Christ.
I beg to differ.
I would argue that separation is, in fact, the key to the testimony of
Christian unity in the world. To deny our differences and force ourselves together
is tantamount to forcing two electrons together. All that can happen is a
clash. They each have their place, but it is not together.
To recognize the nature of each element empowers us to use those elements for
good purposes. To attempt to force them where they do not belong is a mistake
of nuclear proportions.
So it is, I would argue, within the world of Christianity. As a Baptist I
am thoroughly convinced that each man has a right to worship God according to
the dictates of his own conscience (and accept the consequences if he is in
error). The last thing I would ever want to do is attempt to force someone to
believe something they do not believe or worship in a manner that is contrary
to their own understanding. On the other hand, I would be loathe to allow
someone to interfere with my own understanding of worship and faith. I allow
for the reasonable exchange of ideas, even when it comes to ideas of faith and
worship. I may find my own faith sharpened by the challenge of another who has
studied well their position, but has come to a different view than my own – so long
as neither of us is bound in some way to agreement. Our very separation allows
for a free exchange of ideas. The problem arises when we are bound together
through some artificial means where one or the other or perhaps neither of us
is free to express our faith and worship before the Lord without in some way
offending the other party. Separation liberates us to worship the Lord according
to the dictates of our own conscience without violating the conscience of the
other.
The confused mess we find in Christianity today is, to a large degree,
the consequence of ignoring the principles of separation. We have young couples
ignoring these principles in their quest for a lifelong spouse. Believing they
are free to do so, they marry someone of another faith, or else no faith at
all. But this union must result in either conflict or violation of conscience.
We see Protestants whose doctrinal perspectives are Calvinist yoking with a
church whose tradition is Arminian. The argument is that the doctrines are
insignificant compared to the relationships in the church. But someone has compromised
their doctrine or else such a relationship cannot exist. Either the one joining
has submitted his own theology or else the church has compromised theirs.
The same compromise of separation is happening within Independent Baptist
circles. Because of the influence of Fundamentalism (which was a Protestant
movement that Baptists got caught up in)
- We have some Independent Baptists that are
decidedly Calvinistic (they would probably prefer the term “reformed”).
- We have some Independent Baptists that are quite
Arminian (I refer to them as immersing Methodists. They have patterned
themselves after the Fundamental Methodist Evangelist, Bob Jones).
- We have some Independent Baptists who try to
avoid those Protestant influences and follow the Baptist conviction of Biblicism.
While most Independent Baptists claim to believe in the principle of the
local church, we have, within the broad spectrum of Independent Baptists,
various views of the local church:
- Some will acknowledge they also believe in a
universal church
- Some believe in the local church, but see it as
imperfect and therefore not authoritative
- Some see the local church as the only vehicle God
uses
- Some see larger local churches as having obvious
authority over smaller ones
- Some see the local church, regardless of size, as
the pillar and ground of truth
The problem is we have come to think of all these persuasions as
belonging to the same school of thought.
- We have preaching conferences and fellowships
attended by men of any one of these persuasions.
- We send students off to Independent Baptist
Colleges without regard to the particular persuasion of that school in
comparison (or contrast) to our own.
- We entertain missionaries for church support regardless
of which persuasion they may hold.
This arrangement breeds conflict. Someone must either submit their own
conscience to that of another or stand for their conscience (and appear to be a
belligerent) in someone else’s domain.
The answer is not, can not, must not be to ignore the differences. Unity
at the price of conscience is not a fair trade. No. The answer is simply to
- Acknowledge the differences,
- Respect the differences and in Christian charity
- Separate because of the differences
Marvin McKenzie
In the fields
