If Only He Could Write It Now

Luke 16:23 KJV
And in hell he lift up his eyes, being in torments ....

I recently read a man's last post to his blog chronicling his fight with cancer and the face of death. He had written the blog with instructions to his family to post it as his last, after he had died. And my heart broke for his wife and children who followed his wishes even after he was gone. I can only imagine the pain they must experience with this loss. Having tried to help many many families through their suffering in this time of loss, I know that each family, and most members of the family, must grieve and process their loss in their own way. I long for this family to find peace and hope in the face of loss.

The blogger wrote positively about his death. But he did not write biblically. In fact, that was the point of the blog. It was his final statement of rejection of Bible truth. He said he had simply ceased, like a frog or some other lower life form, when his last breath was taken, he was not merely gone from his body, he was gone completely. He assured his readers that he felt neither joy or pain, eternal bliss or judgment. Speaking, as he imagined he was, from the grave, he asserted that he had no thought, no consciousness, no afterlife.

Here is the trouble; he had no experienced death when he wrote with such assurance about what happens after death. He did not know what was beyond the grave, if anything was beyond the grave.

Only one man has ever gone to the grave and returned to tell us certainly what lies beyond the grave. Jesus Christ did die, was buried and three days and night later, rose again. And Jesus Christ affirms that there is life after death for both those who believe and those who do not.

Oh, how my heart is burdened for those who have lost loved ones to the grave. But there is no assurance in wishful thinking. Only established fact can comfort us at the graveside. And the established fact is that Jesus died, was buried and rose again, and those who place saving faith in Him are promised eternal heaven. Those who do not, are condemned already.

Spurgeon's, "A Defense of Calvinism"

I am writing this piece in response to a comment posted on one of my messages posted on YouTube[1]. In the message I make mention of Spurgeon being considered "the prince of preachers". Interestingly my remark in this particular message is not necessarily a positive one, but meant to make a comparison to a more modern preacher. Anyway, someone took exception and left a comment that Spurgeon was a Calvinist, that he had written a book entitled "A Defense of Calvinism" and that Spurgeon was the "prince of Devils". 

I see absolutely no purpose for the spirit of a remark like that. The heart of some people is filled with such vitriol that it is no wonder many in the world dislike Christians. Some Christians make it a point to be dislikeable. 

I am no Calvinist. I am thoroughly convinced that Christ's death on the Cross was sufficient for salvation of every human being in the world for all of the time of the world. God would have all men to be saved. Christ's work is able to save all who come to Him. The conviction of the Holy Spirit extends to all men. 

I am no Calvinist. I am as opposed to the reformers doctrine as to the papal traditions. I do not question their sincerity, but sincerity is not the target. Truth is the mark we are going for. That is a mark the Protestants of every stripe fell far short of. Had they desired the truth they could have come out of Catholicism and united with the Anabaptists that were all around them. They did not for two very telling reasons:
The Anabaptist faith was much too strict for them. They could not see how a church could survive with such high standards for its people.
The Anabaptist conviction of separation of church and state was incomprehensible to them. They could not envision a church surviving without the aide of the government.
I am no Calvinist.

But neither am I an opponent of a man like Spurgeon. 

Since the person commenting on my message brought up Spurgeon's book, "A Defense of Calvinism" I looked it up and read it.[2] 

First, it is not a book, but a very short piece. I can't imagine this person could have even skimmed it and still called it a book.

Second, it is hardly a defense of Calvinism. Spurgeon does clearly call himself a Calvinist, but he calls Calvinism a nickname. He does not see himself in a Calvinist movement and does not align himself with the Protestant Calvin. Spurgeon does identify himself as a Baptist in the piece but, like most Baptists in England in that era, saw Calvinism as a doctrinal position and not a Protestant movement.

Thirdly, Spurgeon does not, in this piece, connect himself with the egregious doctrines of Calvinism but very clearly planned the piece to defend only one doctrine associated with Calvinism, that of eternal security. Only the most ardent Arminian would have any objection to that.
·      There is no mention of total depravity
·      There is no mention of unconditional election
·      There is no mention of limited atonement
·      There is no mention of irresistible grace

He does speak of the doctrine of election but there is nothing of choosing some for hell. Spurgeon defines Calvinism as, "… one who says, Salvation of the Lord." If this were all that is Calvinism today, I would have little objection to the doctrine and only object to its association to a man rather than the Bible.

I confess it once again. I am no Calvinist. But neither do I see Spurgeon as a devil

Marvin McKenzie
In the Fields




[1] www.youtube.com/watch?v=lsTp3lSr2RU&list=UULxzDGVFHvCIubQoIrZCjsA
[2] www.ntslibrary.com/PDF%20Books/A%20Defense%20of%20Calvinism%20by%20Spurgeon.pdf, Accessed 11-4-14

Buy the Boat

Life Is Short - Buy the Boat Recently, while traveling south on I-5, entering the Fife Washington area, I saw the brightly lit advertisement...