Happiness

Luke 15:7 KJV
I say unto you, that likewise joy shall be in heaven over one sinner that repenteth, more than over ninety and nine just persons, which need no repentance.

Luke 15:10 KJV
Likewise, I say unto you, there is joy in the presence of the angels of God over one sinner that repenteth.

Mankind is always looking for that which makes man happy.

The Utilitarian's Creed is "the greatest happiness for the greatest number."
It is significant that he says happiness rather than good.

The philosopher, John Locke, proposed that each man possesses the unalienable right to life, liberty and property.
Significantly, when writing the declaration of independence Jefferson rephrased it; life, liberty and the pursuit of happiness.

Here the Bible tells us then that heaven is the end of that pursuit. The Bible tells us what it is that brings joy into heaven: just one sinner that repenteth. The question has to be raised, "why not over the ninety and nine?" The biblical answer is because there is no such ninety and nine. There is no such person as a just person that needs no repentance.

If in fact, as Jefferson wrote, we all possess the unalienable right to pursue happiness, I urge then that every man pursue repentance in Jesus Christ.

The Faith of Our Faith

I have elected to repost a few of my recent Daily Visits with God at this site. They seemed appropriate for here too.

Luke 16:19 KJV
There was a certain rich man, which was clothed in purple and fine linen, and fared sumptuously every day:

I am thinking today of the place of faith in our faith.

Faith sees the evidence that is unseen to the eye of practicality and perhaps even sees, through the evidence that the eye of practicality presents, the evidence the eye of practicality is unable to see.

For the faithless, the practical, they must act on what they know to be true based upon evidence. But because they don't know if they ever have all of the evidence they never know if they hold the whole truth. Bertrand Russell expresses this in his book on Problems of Philosophy. The problem with philosophy, as I can see it, is that it only has problems. It has not, indeed can never have any real answers.

Faith takes us beyond the problem and points out what is the answer in Jesus Christ. Man is truly a spiritual being, created to know Christ. Without Christ the wisest we can ever be is only to see the question.

Stand Still

Stand still.
A soldier has fallen to the ground today
The battlefield has had its way
He will not fight another day
Stand still. Stand still.

Stand still.
Stand still and pray for those at home
And for soldiers while they roam
On foreign soil’s combat zone
Stand still. Stand still.

Stand still.
That soul has now gone to beyond
To heaven’s glories or to hell’s real horrors
Stand still. Stand still.

Stand still.
Stand still and thank God for His grace
You did not die in his place
That image could have born your face
Stand still. Stand still.

Stand still.
Stand still and look this once more
To a far off hill on a distant shore
One there did His Father’s will
Stand still. Stand still.

Stand still
Stand still and see Him on the cross
Giving all there was to give
That you and I might get to live
Stand still. Stand still.

Stand still
Stand still and view that empty tomb
In it He found there was not room
So up He rose from that space
And left our sins in His place
Stand still. Stand still.

Stand still.
Stand still if you would have Him win
For you a victory from sin
You cannot earn a home on high
By grace through faith is the Father’s cry
Stand still

Stand still
Stand still come this solemn Day
You owe him that much won’t you say?
A soldier’s fallen to the ground today
Stand still. Stand still.

Marvin McKenzie
For Memorial Day Weekend
5-25-2007

The Patriotic Principle

In view of the upcoming Memorial Day it seemed appropriate to place this larger piece in the blog today. I am in complete agreement that country, patriotism and memorializing men should not cloud out the worship of Christ on Sunday. To have respect for those who have given their lives for our nation, that must be once again instilled in us.

This is the first chapter of a small book I wrote entitled, The Patriotic Principle

1 Peter 2:13-15
Submit yourselves to every ordinance of man for the Lord's sake: whether it be to the king, as supreme;Or unto governors, as unto them that are sent by him for the punishment of evildoers, and for the praise of them that do well.For so is the will of God, that with well doing ye may put to silence the ignorance of foolish men: (KJV)

Would patriotism be right if you lived in - RUSSIA? Or, is it right to be patriotic only if you live in the United States? It all depends on what you mean by patriotism. The word itself means allegiance, and loyalty.

We could define patriotism as GOOD CITIZENSHIP and in that light it does not matter what country you are from, good citizenship ought to be the norm for the Christian.

THE RESPONSIBILITIES OF PATRIOTISM
A. Pray for those in Authority
1 Timothy 2:1-3
I exhort therefore, that, first of all, supplications, prayers, intercessions, and giving of thanks, be made for all men;For kings, and for all that are in authority; that we may lead a quiet and peaceable life in all godliness and honesty.For this is good and acceptable in the sight of God our Saviour; (KJV)

Our first and most important responsibility is to pray for those in authority. We Christians should know the names of as many in authority as possible, and earnestly, genuinely pray for them. Not just the
• President
• Senate and Legislators
• The mayor
• The police officers
• The firemen
• Judges

The more of these people we can pray for by name, the better.
B. Submit to their leadership
1 Peter 2:13-15
Submit yourselves to every ordinance of man for the Lord's sake: whether it be to the king, as supreme;Or unto governors, as unto them that are sent by him for the punishment of evildoers, and for the praise of them that do well. For so is the will of God, that with well doing ye may put to silence the ignorance of foolish men: (KJV)
We are to obey the laws our government establishes.

C. Pay your taxes
Romans 13:6-7
For for this cause pay ye tribute also: for they are God's ministers, attending continually upon this very thing. Render therefore to all their dues: tribute to whom tribute is due; custom to whom custom; fear to whom fear; honour to whom honour. (KJV)

Along with paying the taxes that are due we are to give honor to those in authority; treat them with respect.

D. In our country, vote.
This is not the privilege of every country. However, here in the United States, we have the right to influence our country through the vote, and it should be considered the responsibility of every Christian to exercise their vote for moral good.

PATRIOTISM IS "BOUNDARYLESS"
A. It is unbounded by time.

Patriotism was first seen in the Jewish community during Moses' day. And, in fact, patriotism was instilled in them because of their religion. Their nation was so tied to their faith that they almost could not help but be patriotic.
• Their first and second national leaders were both divinely called.
• Their land was divinely given
• Their government was divinely ordered

So, the principle of patriotism reaches far earlier than just in our own country's 235 year history.

B. It is unbounded by nationality.
Patriotism is not just an American thing, it is a Christian thing. We have just said that the Jewish race is a patriotic people. But, the principle of patriotism holds true for all other nations as well.
• Russia
• Germany
• Japan
• England
• France

The responsibilities of good citizenship hold true no matter what country you are from. The United States has a unique type of patriotism though. It is more than good citizenship. It springs from the belief that our country was founded for something special.

Just as the Jews saw themselves as a unique nation, called out by God for His own purpose
• America has a heritage that is unique.
• America has been uniquely blessed. And
• America has been uniquely used to influence this world for right.

I would remind you, however that just as God removed His blessings from Israel because she fell away from God, God can, and may already have, remove His hand of blessing from America.

THE LIMITS OF PATRIOTISM
Acts 5:29
Then Peter and the other apostles answered and said, We ought to obey God rather than men. (KJV)

A. Our responsibility to obey stops when the government wants us to disobey God.
• Daniel prayed to God even when there was a law against it.
• The three Hebrews wouldn't pray to the statue even when there was a law to do it.
• The Apostles witnessed for Christ even when ordered not to

B. Our responsibility stops ONLY at that point.
In every one of these cases, these men were still obedient to all other responsibilities of good citizenship.

C. Our responsibility to give honor does not stop even at that point.
In each one of the above cases you will find that they still paid honor and respect to these men for the positions they held.

Christianity is More than Philosophy

One of my interests in reading Benjamin Franklin's autobiography has been to learn from Franklin himself what his view of Christianity was. So many things are said about him, in his case we can hear from him personally. I find in interesting, for instance, that Franklin covered his acquaintance with George Whitefield. It was not necessary to his biography, even when considering that Whitefield stayed in Franklin's home. No doubt many stayed whose names are not mentioned. Franklin was impressed it seems to me, with Whitefield's skills, but he does not appear to be overly impressed with the influence he had in America in general. His mentioning him at all indicates some degree of heart tug toward the faith. Franklin also speaks of a meeting house he helped finance for itinerant preachers and specifically mentions that it would have been available to Muslims, should they have requested the use of it. His position was obviously not opposed to non - Christian faiths.

Reading his autobiography has caused me to ponder the relationship between religion and philosophy, and especially between Christianity and philosophy. Franklin was unquestionably a philosopher. He devoted much of himself to improving his own and society in general's morality. It appears to me that Franklin's only real connection with Christianity was in its value toward improving morality.

Associated with my interest in Franklin, I have been doing a little research of philosophy in general. No wonder religion and philosophy are so identified in the academic world; philosophy is an attempt to answer the same questions religion addresses;
• How did we get here?
• Why are we here?
• What will happen to us when we are no longer here?

Philosophy is an attempt to define and bring in to focus our worldview. Religion is the same.

But true Christianity is different, I think. Philosophy (and religion) aim to identify and then mold our beliefs. Philosophy would view all worldviews as equal and then debate the merits of one over against the other so far as the particular world view's ability enhance a man's morality and thereby improve society and the life of mankind in general. True Christianity, however, cannot be debated.
  • Philosophy begins and ends with man.
  • True Christianity begins and ends with God.

  • Philosophy sees the improvement of this world as the aim
  • True Christianity sees the kingdom of God as the aim

  • Philosophy is a study
  • True Christianity is relationship with a Person

  •  Philosophy is an opinion
  • True Christianity is settled in the indisputable fact of God's Word

Marvin McKenzie
In the fields

Pre-Tribulation Rapture

Revelation 3:10
Because thou hast kept the word of my patience, I also will keep thee from the hour of temptation, which shall come upon all the world, to try them that dwell upon the earth.
The Pre-Tribulation rapture: at one time, the mainstay of Fundamentalists; today, men who used to be strong supporters attack this doctrine openly. Why would this doctrine be so difficult to grasp, and why would there be such a stand against it?

The rapture refers to a time when the Lord will return in the clouds and call all Christians to heaven, Although the word is not found in the Bible, the doctrine definitely is.
Paul spoke about this event in,
I Thessalonians 4:13-18
But I would not have you to be ignorant, brethren, concerning them which are asleep, that ye sorrow not, even as others which have no hope.
For if we believe that Jesus died and rose again, even so them also which sleep in Jesus will God bring with him.
For this we say unto you by the word of the Lord, that we which are alive and remain unto the coming of the Lord shall not prevent them which are asleep.
For the Lord himself shall descend from heaven with a shout, with the voice of the archangel, and with the trump of God: and the dead in Christ shall rise first:
Then we which are alive and remain shall be caught up together with them in the clouds, to meet the Lord in the air: and so shall we ever be with the Lord.
Wherefore comfort one another with these words.

There are four basic views that are taught about when the rapture will occur

There is the view that no rapture will occur
There are those that believe that things will continue on as they are forever, and that the only way a person gets to heaven is by death. This seems to be so blatantly contrary to literal Bible interpretation, that only the most liberal religionists believe it.

It does seem to be gaining a foothold even among some who claim to be Bible believers. Events like last week's foolish rapture prediction give credence to those claiming that there is
  • no rapture
  • no tribulation and
  • no literal kingdom of Christ on this earth
The kingdom of God is, they would have us to believe, within you. When you die, if you are a Christian, then you will go to heaven.

There is the view we call the Pre-Tribulation Rapture  
This view holds that the rapture will occur just before the tribulation period that the Bible says will one day try all the earth with sufferings such as this world has never before seen.

The third view might be called the Mid-Tribulation Rapture
This view holds that the rapture of the church does not happen until half way through the Tribulation. The Tribulation, according to the Bible, is seven years long. The first three and one-half years are of comparative peace; the second three and one-half years are the ones with terrible trials. This view places the rapture after the three and one-half years of peace, but before the three and one-half years of trial.

There is the view commonly called the Post-Tribulation Rapture
This is the "bouncing ball" theory. The view teaches that those Christians that have survived the Tribulation alive will be raptured out of this earth at the end of the Tribulation, and then immediately return to the earth as Jesus establishes His kingdom here.

A brief history of the development of these views.
The earliest Christians believed in the pre-tribulation rapture. In I Thessalonians 4:17 Paul said,
Then we which are alive and remain shall be caught up together with them in the clouds...

Paul believed that the rapture would happen in his own lifetime. He did not believe that he would die before Jesus would take him to Heaven. In fact, it sounds as if there was a church that believed they were in the Tribulation, and Paul wrote to them to let them know that they would not have to go through that.

The church of Thessalonica was severely persecuted. The lost people of Thessalonica ran Paul out of town in just four weeks, and then followed him to the next town and tried to run him out there too. II Thessalonians was written by Paul to encourage these persecuted believers that they were not going through the great Tribulation. Look at
II Thessalonians 1:6-8
Seeing it is a righteous thing with God to recompense tribulation to them that trouble you;
And to you who are troubled rest with us, when the Lord Jesus shall be revealed from heaven with his mighty angels,
In flaming fire taking vengeance on them that know not God, and that obey not the gospel of our Lord Jesus Christ:

II Thessalonians 2:1-8
Now we beseech you, brethren, by the coming of our Lord Jesus Christ, and by our gathering together unto him,
That ye be not soon shaken in mind, or be troubled, neither by spirit, nor by word, nor by letter as from us, as that the day of Christ is at hand.
Let no man deceive you by any means: for that day shall not come, except there come a falling away first, and that man of sin be revealed, the son of perdition;
Who opposeth and exalteth himself above all that is called God, or that is worshipped; so that he as God sitteth in the temple of God, shewing himself that he is God.
Remember ye not, that, when I was yet with you, I told you these things?
And now ye know what withholdeth that he might be revealed in his time.
For the mystery of iniquity doth already work: only he who now letteth will let, until he be taken out of the way.
And then shall that Wicked be revealed, whom the Lord shall consume with the spirit of his mouth, and shall destroy with the brightness of his coming:

One of the arguments used by those opposed to the Pre-Tribulation rapture view, is that there is no evidence of churches that taught this view prior to the 1800's. This is not necessarily a concrete argument against the view since those persecuting them destroyed much of their writings before the 1700’s. The Protestant views have been essentially restructured Catholic views and would predictably not be reliable.

As the Catholic Church grew and took root, it began to teach that the Bible was not to be taken literally, but spiritually. They ignored the literal teaching of the Bible and replaced it with a spiritual teaching. Catholicism eventually began to teach that there would be no Tribulation, or even a literal kingdom when Christ returned to earth.

Since most of today's Christendom traces its roots back to Catholicism, they also take their doctrines from some form of the Catholic teachings. The Reformers tried to justify a literal interpretation of the Bible with their Catholic teachings by coming up with such things as Post-Tribulationalism and the like.

In the late 1800's and early 1900's two men, both Protestants, began to popularize the “Pre-Tribulational Rapture” position. They were C. I. Scofield, and Lewis Sperry Chafer. Scofield wrote the notes in the still popular Scofield Reference Bible. Chafer founded the Dallas Theological
Seminary. Both promoted the Pre-Tribulation rapture very successfully. I should say they did not dream up the doctrine. The Pre-Tribulation rapture had been taught and preached by many throughout the centuries, they were just the ones to make them popular.

Back in the 70's and 80's, when I first began to live for the Lord, there was no question concerning the subject of the Pre-Tribulation rapture among Fundamentalists. The Charismatics however, had written several books on what they called the Mid-Tribulation rapture.

Three reasons why the rapture takes place before the Tribulation

Because our judgment has already been dealt with on the cross.
The Tribulation serves two purposes: First, to bring the Jews to a place where they will trust Christ as Saviour. Second, to judge the Gentiles for their idolatry and rejection of God.
For the Christian, both issues are dealt with. We have already trusted Christ as Saviour, so we would not need this Tribulation. Our sins have been judged in Jesus; He has already taken the judgment for them and God does not remember them any more. There is, therefore, no reason for us to be in the Tribulation.

What purpose is there for the rapture if not to rescue the Christian from Tribulation suffering?
There is none. The rapture's entire purpose is to take the believer out of this world while the world is judged. The idea of the "bouncing ball" is out of character for God! He would not rapture us to heaven only to return moments later with Jesus.

The word “church” is not found anywhere in the book of Revelation after the Tribulation begins.
In Revelation 2-3, there are the letters to the seven churches. In Revelation 4:1, John is told to "...Come up hither..." and be shown the things that will happen in the future (the Tribulation). The church is not found again on earth! That is because the church has been removed, or raptured to heaven.

There would be no hope in the return of the Lord, no real reason for looking forward to His return if you believed that you would have to face suffering and even death at the hands of anti-Christ before Jesus arrived.

The rapture is pre-tribulational. God will remove us from this earth before the hour of trial that is to try this earth. This is the blessed hope of the believer.

Sound Thinking in the Last Days

2 Peter 3:2-10 KJV
That ye may be mindful of the words which were spoken before by the holy prophets, and of the commandment of us the apostles of the Lord and Saviour:
Knowing this first, that there shall come in the last days scoffers, walking after their own lusts,
And saying, Where is the promise of his coming? for since the fathers fell asleep, all things continue as they were from the beginning of the creation.
For this they willingly are ignorant of, that by the word of God the heavens were of old, and the earth standing out of the water and in the water:
Whereby the world that then was, being overflowed with water, perished:
But the heavens and the earth, which are now, by the same word are kept in store, reserved unto fire against the day of judgment and perdition of ungodly men.
But, beloved, be not ignorant of this one thing, that one day is with the Lord as a thousand years, and a thousand years as one day.
The Lord is not slack concerning his promise, as some men count slackness; but is longsuffering to us-ward, not willing that any should perish, but that all should come to repentance.
But the day of the Lord will come as a thief in the night; in the which the heavens shall pass away with a great noise, and the elements shall melt with fervent heat, the earth also and the works that are therein shall be burned up.

If Harold Camping's math is right, this will be my last blog post. Tomorrow I will be raptured to heaven and this world will begin the Great Tribulation. Of course the worldly and the lost have misinterpreted Camping as saying that tomorrow will be the end of the world (in some cases they have said it will be the beginning of the end of the world) they do not understand some of the finer points of dispensational eschatology.

Camping has made the fundamental error he was guilty of many years ago and that so many others have also been guilty of, that of assigning a date for the rapture. The Word of God is so clear that no man will know the day or hour it boggles the mind that there are people who continue to set dates and there are people who continue to believe them.

What concerns me most, however, is that some who style themselves as Bible students, believers in Christ and theologians dismiss the concept of the rapture (at least the pre-tribulational rapture) as a non issue. Some have made it sound as if the doctrine of the literal return of Christ into the clouds to remove his saints is a doctrine Christianity has evolved away from. This makes sense when you realize that Reformation preachers, even reformed Baptists, are in fact Protestants. Their whole view of church history is one of evolving and progressive doctrine. Dispensationalism, they seem to claim, is a doctrinal position whose way has gone the same as witch hunts, or other superstitious beliefs that attached themselves to fanatical believers.

I am here to say that I still believe in the literal and imminent rapture of the children of God prior to the literal seven years of tribulation which will try this earth. I do not know when it will happen. I doubt that that it will be tomorrow.

But to be honest; I am in many ways hopeful it will be.

Marvin McKenzie
In the fields

How Much Schooling is Enough Schooling for Those Who Tend to Souls?

I was thinking about college courses the other day - training men for the ministry and how it just doesn't seem like they can be prepared in three or four years.

There is too much to learn.
I was taught that college was not supposed to teach you what to know but to teach you how to learn.

And I don't think that is working very well.
We are sending men out who change their doctrine five years into the ministry.

They don't even know what they believe yet.

And then I thought- "Yes but the reason we use the three year program is it is the model Jesus gave us. He trained His Apostles three years."
And that is true, but He did it differently than we do in a college where a student gets at the most twenty hours of study a week.

His students followed Him 24/7.
With the exception of those times He sent them on ministry excursions, or those times He separated for prayer, (and even those times can be considered a part of the educational process) they were with Him everywhere.

365 days x3 years x 16 hours (allowing 8 hours sleep)= 17520 hours

If a student were going to school two semesters per year, 20 hours per week, that would be the equivalent of 27 1/2 years of education.

There was a time in history when a man was not considered mature enough to be a pastor until he was approaching 70 years old. Certainly we would be better off if those who believed they were called into the ministry spent tons more time preparing today. Younger men in the pastorate ought to be placed under the care of a much older man of God and be held accountable to him. Not just as an advisor, but as an authority over him. I suggest a minimum of ten years, perhaps even fifteen.

Feed My Sheep

I read an article today at bloggingtheologically.com having to do with the responsibility of the pastor. The article takes us to John 21:15-17 (and I wished the author used the KJV, unfortunately he does not) and emphasizes the work of the pastor to feed God's sheep. It is not the responsibility, he suggests, for the sheep to feed themselves; it is the pastor's duty.


I had a conversation with a pastor friend of mine just last week. He shared a portion of his own testimony and said that when he got saved it was almost immediate for him that he began reading the Bible regularly and studying it on his own. Upon entering the ministry, he was frustrated for some time because others would get saved but would not be so faithful and diligent. But then it struck him; he was led to study the Word of God because God had gifted him to become a pastor. Others are not so gifted. Pastors must study the Word of God so they are able to feed the sheep God places in his care. The sheep are not as moved to care for themselves. He said he learned from that to make it his responsibility to tell his congregation weekly what portions of Scripture they should read. He began to give them a reading plan, and then he gave the a plan for prayer.


Rather than chiding them or being frustrated with them for not doing what he now believes they are not called to do, he took the responsibility for their study of the Scripture and their personal time in prayer. He helps them feed by taking them to the pastures he wants them to feed upon that week.

Not bad!

Culture and Christianity

Today's edition of Kevin Bauder's, In the Nick of Time is entitled, Christians and High Culture, Again. I have pasted here a large number of quotes from that article and, while I have not intentionally misrepresented his article, neither is it my point in this blog to repeat the point of his article. I refer my readers to his original piece linked above.

First, the selected quotes and then a short commentary.

"As Matthew Arnold envisioned it, high culture is the effort to “know the best that has been thought and said in the world” (Culture and Anarchy). It consists of those products of civilization that are deliberately meant to preserve, shape, and propagate human ideals and mores.


"Typically, high cultures have centered upon worship—not surprisingly, since every culture is the incarnation of a religion.


"They also explore answers to the perennial questions such as the nature of existence, truth, freedom, justice, duty, goodness, and beauty.
The utterly unlettered or completely bumptious have only rarely made much of a contribution to Christian thought or sensibility.


"Christianity depends upon cultural mastery for its own wellbeing. The understanding and preservation of correct doctrine requires theologians who have spent sufficient time in the academy to master intellectual discipline. …. When such persons are lacking, Christianity enters periods of base and unfruitful expression (such as the present hour).


"Our Christianity is not supposed to be confined to church. It is supposed to affect all of life. Consequently, Christians should look at all of life—including common or mundane things—from a unique perspective…


"Christians make a serious mistake when they think that their use of culture applies only to church. It also applies to eating and drinking, marrying and giving in marriage. It is about all of the mundane activities of life, each of which has its own place in the purpose of God and its own luster when it occupies that place. These activities are common to all humans, and so are the enduring questions that arise from the consideration of those things.


"Not every Christian needs to be a philosopher, a poet, a composer, or an artist. Some, however, will find that their callings involve exactly these disciplines. They will be called to involve themselves with high culture. Far from opposing high culture, the remainder of Christians should celebrate such callings. Without them, Christian faith and life would be crippled."

Here is my point; Christians must see themselves as the shapers of culture. If every culture is indeed, "the incarnation of religion" Then Christians must not allow themselves to be merely a part of their culture but must aggressively work to influence shape and mold that culture into the image of pure religion.

Jailhouse Christianity

Our church has a reader sign in front of the very busy road we are located on. Having appropriate and insightful and very concise (less the 140 character) messages on the sign can sometimes be challenging.

• Generally we get positive feedback
• From time to time it has been quite negative
• Sometimes we what we displayed didn't mean to passers by what we thought it meant to us

So I am sensitive concerning others and the messages they display. This then is not meant to be a criticism but a matter of thought.

The message I on another church's sign today reads, "Children brought up in church are seldom caught in jail."

First, there is some question as to the accuracy of the statement
The word seldom may be the saving statement of the message. Perhaps it is true that per capita church kids end up in jail less than kids who have not grown up in church. But I have met plenty of adults who grew up in church, some in fundamental Baptist churches, who have done time; hard time. My friends involved prison ministry have testified that lots of church kids and even preachers kids are locked up right now. So the message is cute and hopeful but might not be true.

More seriously though, I question the point of the statement
And would go so far as to say it is dangerous. It is the wrong message. It makes the church out to be the hope of the family, the hope of our children and the rescuer of the potential inmate. The church is not the hope; Christ is.

This is tantamount to being a false gospel. It is probably what most people who attend church think is the gospel and it is damning families to heartbreak when their kids go bad, bitterness at the church, and eternity in hell. They placed their hope in church, not in Jesus Christ.

Church is terribly important. I would suggest that the professing Christian who sees no need for church membership, worship and service has never met Christ as Saviour. But church is not the Saviour. Sometimes a person glosses over the Saviour, to get into the church where they have been led to believe their help lies. They assume salvation and then commence into church life expecting to have all their problems resolved there. That's backwards. We must become in love and engrossed in the things of God. That is the most likely way our kids will come to be saved and learn to love the Lord themselves.

Subculture or Counter Culture

Back in April of this year Elizabeth Vargas gave her expose' of what they called this "dangerous subculture" known as Independent Fundamental Baptists. The term subculture struck me as I meditate considerably on the issues of Christianity and culture. It does not seem to me that Christianity ought to fit into the realm of the culture in which it finds itself but it ought to create its own culture. Missionaries are quick to tell me that what I believe to be Christian culture is not but merely American Christian culture.

But the term subculture sounded shocking to me. Almost underground. Include independent Baptists in with the subcultures of
• Marijuana smoking free sexers
• Underground poet societies
• Goth
• Punk, etc.

But even more unnerving to me is the connotation that our "subculture" is somehow beneath what is the true culture of America.

This week I heard a man refer to the Ana Baptists not as a subculture but as a counter culture in their day. That speaks volumes to me. That is Biblical Christianity.
• It is not blended into the culture it finds itself
• It is not under and somehow subservient to the surrounding culture

Christianity is supposed to run counter to the culture in which it is found. It is to oppose, to check and to resist the cultures of this world.

Matthew 5:13-16 KJV
Ye are the salt of the earth: but if the salt have lost his savour, wherewith shall it be salted? it is thenceforth good for nothing, but to be cast out, and to be trodden under foot of men.
Ye are the light of the world. A city that is set on an hill cannot be hid.
Neither do men light a candle, and put it under a bushel, but on a candlestick; and it giveth light unto all that are in the house.
Let your light so shine before men, that they may see your good works, and glorify your Father which is in heaven.

Christian faith is not supposed to be a sub culture it is supposed to be another culture, a different culture. And that is perhaps our biggest problem today. We appear to be too much like a light under a bushel, we are there, we have light, but it is muffled under the basket of cultural worldliness.

Only when we become counter to the culture will we truly be a light on a hill.

Sin Invented?

The other day someone responded to a friend of mine by saying that sin was invented by the Bible (I would presume he meant those who wrote it) so that it could then be cured by the Bible. He went on to ask, "Would you be grateful to a doctor who cut you just so he could stitch you back up?" But is sin really just the invention of the Bible? Would there really be no such thing as sin if there were no such thing as the Bible? It isn't that difficult to find an answer.

The problem of sin existed before there was a Bible. I know believing the Bible will give me critics; but I ask my critics to confirm that the oldest portions of the Bible are only about 4000 years old and that known human history records stories of wars, rebellion and Conquest prior to the writing of Moses. Would we really insist that war is not sinful? I am reminded that one of the early accusations the American Indians had about as Christianity is that it took the honor out of murder. The Indians believed they did no wrong in killing another human being so long as they did not dishonor the body of the dead by stealing from it. Really?

Speaking of native people, there are, people groups who do not have a word of the Bible. Those people groups each have some code of ethics, morality, right and wrong. Even in the least civilized people groups there is some form of government and some means of dealing with those who will not live for the betterment of the group as a whole. The word "sin" may not exist in their vocabulary but the problem of sin does.

The Bible did not create the concept of sin so it could then be the cure of sin. But it does offer the only true cure for sin. In Benjamin Franklin's autobiography he described his method of becoming perfectly moral. He believed that since he thought he knew right from wrong and desired to be perfectly moral, it should not be a problem to become perfectly moral. I note two things about his system;
First, even he included a passage of Scripture to meditate upon daily
Though he saw that Scripture as merely a wise saying rather than God breathed.

Second, he admitted failure
Though he wanted to be moral; though he believed he knew right from wrong, though he applied himself to becoming perfectly moral nearly his entire adult life, he admitted he had failed. Only the Bible offers a perfect solution to the sin problem and it is not in a system but in a Person. Jesus Christ came
• First to seek the lost, finding out those who longed to be forgiven
• Secondly to pay the price of sin dying in the place of the sinner and giving us reconciliation with God and
• Finally to prepare for us a place where sin would be non existent

The Bible did not invent sin. But it does offer the only eternal remedy for sin.


Marvin McKenzie
In the fields

A Better Christian Than Me?

I cannot tell how many times I have heard a Christian esteem another and judge themselves with a term similar to this, "He is a better Christian than me."

Such a judgment has sometimes led to one being motivated to grow in the cause of Christ. As often and perhaps more often it leads to compromise or other weaker spiritual traits. Who is to say that they are a better Christian? By what criteria do we make such a judgment? Is one a better Christian because
• They win more people to the Lord?
• They spend more time in the Bible?
• They are less likely to display tendencies of the flesh?

After all I have heard some Christians claim that Mormons are better Christians than they are. Mormons are not Christians at all!

And then when did we get Biblical authority to judge one a better Christian than another? The Bible says 2 Corinthians 10:12 KJV
For we dare not make ourselves of the number, or compare ourselves with some that commend themselves: but they measuring themselves by themselves, and comparing themselves among themselves, are not wise.

It is never safe to compare ourselves among ourselves but would do best to keep our eyes upon the Lord. He is the measure by which we want to place ourselves.

I tend to think that the comparing of our Christianity with that of another person is based rather on our own sense of failure in the Christian life. Which one of us feels like we
• Pray enough?
• Witness enough?
• Know our Bibles well enough?
The most telling though is this, who is it who believes His relationship with Christ is essential and real enough?

We all wrestle with the flesh and we know it. We know it well enough that we certainly want to avoid letting others know it. And here is the thing: that guy who is a better Christian than we are; he's got the same tension inside him we do.

He probably thinks we are better Christians than he is.

Marvin McKenzie
In the field

Buy the Boat

Life Is Short - Buy the Boat Recently, while traveling south on I-5, entering the Fife Washington area, I saw the brightly lit advertisement...